Classless addressing throws out all fixed forms of Classful addressing. And because it does so, routers need extra information to extract the network address or number from a destination …

Thanks beforehand. Like pmckenzie explained above, it depends on the configuration. But yes. RIPv2 is considered to be a Classless-routing protocol since the subnet-mask is advertised …

Classless Addressing: All IP addresses other then the above prefix lenghts are called classless. But there is a condition to use it, mean you must be use a longer/equal prefix lenght for it from …

After subnetting, that is classless addressing, all the 1's combined (network bits +subnet bits) represent one single network and the zero's the host part/bits.

Im a bit confused as to the difference between classless and classful addressing, I understand that classful has 3 parts network, subnet and host, which means a class A B or C network that …

What is classful addressing and classless addressing? i guess, when we use, 10.0.0.0/8 or 172.16.0.0/16 or 192.168.0.0/24 we stick to class rules so it is classful addressing.

By definition, classless routing protocols advertise the mask with each advertised route, and classful routing protocols do not." i.e. RIP-2, EIGRP, or OSPF support VLSM, and are …

As obviously ip classless is the router default, but we still need the necessary "no auto-summary" router configuration mode. Hope I've not muddied up the waters to much with my explanation …

With "ip classless", packets destined to an address are strictly matched against the most specific route in the route table. If no match exists, the default route can be used. Classful (no ip …

That is classless addressing, an efficiently designed scheme. VLSM - That is further subnetting an already subnetted subnet, again one of the reasons to that is to assign different subnets to …